@GeorgeResse pointed out this article http://www.infoworld.com/d/cloud-computing/five-facts-every-cloud-computing-pro-should-know-174 from @DavidLinthicum today. And from a Cloud advocate point of view I like four of the assertions. But his point about Cloud Security is off: “While many are pushing back on cloud computing due to security concerns, cloud computing is, in fact, as safe as or better than most [...]
Filed under: Cloud, Science of Risk Management by alex on Tuesday, September 14, 2010 | Social tagging: Cloud > risk management
5 Comments »
Gideon Rasmussen, CISSP, CISA, CISM, CIPP, writes in his latest blog post (http://www.gideonrasmussen.com/article-22.html) about the BP Oil spill and operational risk, and the damages the spill is causing BP. Ignoring the hindsight bias of the article here… “This oil spill is a classic example of a black swan (events with the potential for severe impact [...]
Filed under: Science of Risk Management by alex on Tuesday, September 7, 2010 | Social tagging: risk > risk management > risk modeling
5 Comments »
In comments to my “Why I Don’t Like CRISC” article, Oliver writes: CobIT allows to segregate what is called IT in analysable parts. Different Risk models apply to those parts. e.g. Information Security, Architecture, Project management. In certain areas the risk models are more mature (Infosec / Project Management) and in certain they are not [...]
Filed under: Science of Risk Management by alex on Friday, July 2, 2010 | Social tagging: CRISC > risk > risk analysis > risk management > risk modeling > risk science
6 Comments »
PREFACE: You might interpret this blog post as being negative about risk management here, dear readers. Don’t. This isn’t a diatrabe against IRM, only why “certification” around information risk is a really, really silly idea. Apparently, my blog about why I don’t like the idea of CRISC has long-term stickiness. Just today, Philip writes in [...]
Filed under: careers by alex on Thursday, June 24, 2010 | Social tagging: CRISC > risk > risk management > risk modeling
3 Comments »
Some time back, a friend of mine said “Alex, I like the concept of Risk Management, but it’s a little like the United Nations – Good in concept, horrible in execution”. Recently, a couple of folks have been talking about how security should just be a “diligence” function, that is, we should just prove that [...]
Filed under: argument, Doing it Differently, Science of Risk Management by alex on Wednesday, March 17, 2010 | Social tagging: best practices > due diligence > risk > risk management
10 Comments »
Longtime readers know that I’m not the biggest fan of GRC as it is “practiced” today. I believe G & C are subservient to risk management. So let me offer you this statement to chew on: “A metric for Governance is only useful inasmuch as it describes an ability to manage risk” True or False, [...]
Filed under: argument, Doing it Differently, Science of Risk Management by alex on Tuesday, December 15, 2009 | Social tagging: GRC > metrics > risk management > risk modeling > risk science > Science of Risk Management > security management > Security Models
15 Comments »
A methodology is presented for guiding individual policy decisions from a risk management perspective, using a form of “abduction validation”. An example is presented using the case of password change policy, drawing from recent blog discussions.
Filed under: Science of Risk Management by Russell on Saturday, December 5, 2009 | Social tagging: passwords > risk analysis > risk management > security policy
8 Comments »
I’d like to wish US readers a happy Thanksgiving. For those outside of the US, I thought this would be a nice little post for today: A pointer to an article in the Financial Times, “Baseball’s love of statistics is taking over football“ Those who indulge my passion for analysis and for sport know that [...]
Filed under: Data Analysis, metrics, Science of Risk Management by alex on Thursday, November 26, 2009 | Social tagging: risk management > Science of Risk Management
No Comments »
Our friend Rich Mogull has an interesting post up on his blog called “Always Assume“. In it, he offers that “assumption” is part of a normal scenario building process, something that is fairly inescapable when making business decisions. And he offers a simple, pragmatic process for assumptions which is mainly scenario development, justification, and action. [...]
Filed under: Science of Risk Management by alex on Friday, November 13, 2009 | Social tagging: Rich Mogull > risk management > risk science > Science of Risk Management
No Comments »
Near misses are very valuable signals regarding future losses. If we ignore them in our cost metrics, we might make some very poor decisions. This example shows that there is a qualitative difference between “ground truth data” (in this case, historical cash flow for data breach events) and overall security metrics, which need to reflect our estimates about the future, a.k.a. risk.
Filed under: Science of Risk Management by Russell on Tuesday, October 6, 2009 | Social tagging: data breach cost > risk management > risk modeling
6 Comments »