<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The New School of Information Security &#187; DHS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newschoolsecurity.com/tag/dhs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newschoolsecurity.com</link>
	<description>The Blog Inspired By The Book</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 16:20:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Cyber-Spies!</title>
		<link>http://newschoolsecurity.com/2009/04/cyber-spies/</link>
		<comments>http://newschoolsecurity.com/2009/04/cyber-spies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breach reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DHS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newschoolsecurity.com/?p=35</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The WSJ has an article up today about how the Russians and Chinese are mapping the US electirical grid.  What I thought was more interesting was the graph they used (which is only mildly related to the article itself). If I&#8217;m reading this correctly, the DHS is claiming that there were just under 70,000 breaches [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The WSJ has an article up today about how the <strong><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123914805204099085.html">Russians and Chinese are mapping the US electirical grid</a></strong>.  What I thought was more interesting was the graph they used (which is only mildly related to the article itself).</p>
<p><img class="alignleft" title="Image from the WSJ" src="http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/P1-AP393_CYBER_NS_20090407224833.gif" alt="" width="183" height="288" /> If I&#8217;m reading this correctly, the DHS is claiming that there were just under 70,000 breaches that were reported to them from somewhere.  That I&#8217;m willing to believe.  But check out that red line for Commercial there &#8211; how interesting is that?  And then compare the red bands of &#8217;06, &#8217;07, and &#8217;08&#8230;</p>
<p>Now in interpreting the graph, I&#8217;m not sure how &#8220;complete&#8221; the DHS&#8217;s Commercial data set is.  After all, businesses will only report a breach when necessary, and it&#8217;s not clear where DHS got it&#8217;s information from.  But Commerical compared to Government is an interesting contrast (I suppose I&#8217;d be willing to put a lower &#8220;uncertainty&#8221; value on the government reported breaches number reported by DHS).  And then there&#8217;s &#8220;Individuals&#8221;.</p>
<p>I find it real interesting that somewhere south of 50,000 individuals told someone that they had a cybersecurity breach (I apologize for using the term &#8220;cyber&#8221;, btw). And it&#8217;s interesting that this number doubled between &#8217;07 and &#8217;08.  I&#8217;m not sure what to make of that, or how these numbers are arrived at.  Are these people reporting directly to DHS?  Do any readers know how DHS gets these numbers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://newschoolsecurity.com/2009/04/cyber-spies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

