The past 10 years have been the best in the country’s aviation history with 153 fatalities. That’s two deaths for every 100 million passengers on commercial flights, according to an Associated Press analysis of government accident data. The improvement is remarkable. Just a decade earlier, at the time the safest, passengers were 10 times as [...]
Filed under: Doing it Differently, measurement, Science of Risk Management by adam on Wednesday, January 25, 2012
No Comments »
In the past, we have has some decidedly critical words for the Ponemon Institute reports, such as “A critique of Ponemon Institute methodology for “churn”” or “Another critique of Ponemon’s method for estimating ‘cost of data breach’“. And to be honest, I’d become sufficiently frustrated that I’d focused my time on other things. So I’d [...]
Filed under: best practice, compliance, measurement, Reports and Data by adam on Monday, January 23, 2012
No Comments »
Bill Brenner started it with “Stop them before they predict again!:” My inbox has been getting hammered with 2012 vendor security predictions since Halloween. They all pretty much state the obvious: Mobile malware is gonna be a big deal Social networking will continue to be riddled with security holes Technologies A, B and C will [...]
Filed under: best practice, measurement by adam on Wednesday, December 21, 2011
1 Comment »
In possibly the worst article on risk assessment I’ve seen in a while, David Lacey of Computerworld gives us the “Six Myth’s Of Risk Assessment.” This article is so patently bad, so heinously wrong, that it stuck in my caw enough to write this blog post. So let’s discuss why Mr. Lacey has no clue [...]
Filed under: measurement, Science of Risk Management by alex on Friday, November 25, 2011
5 Comments »
First, good on AT&T for telling people that there’s been an attempt to hack their account. (My copy of the letter that was sent is after the break.) I’m curious what we can learn by discussing the attack. An AT&T spokesperson told Fox News that “Fewer than 1 percent of customers were targeted.” I’m currently [...]
Filed under: disclosure, Doing it Differently, measurement by adam on Tuesday, November 22, 2011
1 Comment »
On Friday, I watched Eric Ries talk about his new Lean Startup book, and wanted to talk about how it might relate to security. Ries concieves as startups as businesses operating under conditions of high uncertainty, which includes things you might not think of as startups. In fact, he thinks that startups are everywhere, even [...]
Filed under: argument, Doing it Differently, measurement, metrics by adam on Tuesday, September 20, 2011
No Comments »
Following the Diginotar breach, FOX-IT has released analysis and a nifty video showing OCSP requests. As a result, lots of people are quoting a number of “300,000″. Cem Paya has a good analysis of what the OCSP numbers mean, what biases might be introduced at “DigiNotar: surveying the damage with OCSP.” To their credit, FoxIt [...]
Filed under: Data Analysis, disclosure, Doing it Differently, measurement, Reports and Data by adam on Tuesday, September 13, 2011
No Comments »
My colleagues Dinei Florencio and Cormac Herley have a new paper out, “Sex, Lies and Cyber-crime Surveys.” Our assessment of the quality of cyber-crime surveys is harsh: they are so compromised and biased that no faith whatever can be placed in their findings. We are not alone in this judgement. Most research teams who have [...]
Filed under: measurement, metrics by adam on Thursday, June 23, 2011
4 Comments »
First, for those who might have missed it, Google has released Google Refine, a free tool for cleaning dirty data sets. It allows you to pull in disparate data, then organize and clean it for consistency. Next, some interesting thoughts on how “anonymized” data sets aren’t, and some thoughts on the implications of this from [...]
Filed under: measurement, privacy by Chandler on Thursday, May 19, 2011
No Comments »
Mike Rothman’s “Firestarter” on “Risk Metrics are Crap“. It’s very difficult to argue with a poorly constructed argument. Especially when I have no idea what a “risk metric” is. But best as I can tell, Mike’s position is that unless you are smart and/or have strong resources allocated to your InfoSec team, things like metrics, [...]
Filed under: measurement, metrics by alex on Tuesday, March 1, 2011
No Comments »