In the past, we have has some decidedly critical words for the Ponemon Institute reports, such as “A critique of Ponemon Institute methodology for “churn”” or “Another critique of Ponemon’s method for estimating ‘cost of data breach’“. And to be honest, I’d become sufficiently frustrated that I’d focused my time on other things. So I’d [...]
Adam Montville left a comment on my post, “Paper: The Security of Password Expiration“, and I wanted to expand on his question: Passwords suck when they’re not properly cared for. We know this. Any other known form of authentication we have is difficult because of the infrastructure required to pull it off. That sucks too. [...]
Norm Marks of the famous Marks On Governance blog has posted his 2012 wishlist. His blog limits the characters you can leave in a reply, so I thought I’d post mine here. 1. Norm Wishes for “A globally-accepted organizational governance code, encompassing both risk management and internal control” Norm, if you mean encompassing both so [...]
Bill Brenner started it with “Stop them before they predict again!:” My inbox has been getting hammered with 2012 vendor security predictions since Halloween. They all pretty much state the obvious: Mobile malware is gonna be a big deal Social networking will continue to be riddled with security holes Technologies A, B and C will [...]
Over at Risky.biz, Patrick Grey has an entertaining and thought-provoking article, “Why we secretly love LulzSec:” LulzSec is running around pummelling some of the world’s most powerful organisations into the ground… for laughs! For lulz! For shits and giggles! Surely that tells you what you need to know about computer security: there isn’t any. And [...]
Hey everybody! I was just reading Gunnar Peterson’s fun little back of the napkin security spending exercise, in which he references his post on a security budget “flat tax” (Three Steps To A Rational Security Budget). This got me to thinking a bit - What if, instead of in the world of compliance where we [...]
No doubt my “Why I Don’t Like CRISC” blog post has created a ton of traffic and comments. Unfortunately, I’m not a very good writer because the majority of readers miss the point. Let me try again more succinctly: Just because you can codify a standard or practice doesn’t mean that this practice is sane. [...]
Lately there has been quite a bit of noise about the concept of “trust” in information security. This has always confused me, because I tend towards @bobblakley when he says: “trust is for suckers.” But security is keen on having trendy new memes, things to sell you, and I thought that I might as well [...]
I don’t like the term “Best Practices.” Andrew and I railed against it in the book (pages 36-38). I’ve made comments like “torture is a best practice,” “New best practice: think” and Alex has asked “Are Security “Best Practices” Unethical?“ But people keep using it. Worse, my co-workers are now using it just to watch [...]
Since writing the New School, I’ve been thinking a lot about why seems so hard to get there. There are two elements which Andrew and I didn’t explicitly write about which I think are tremendously important. Both of them have to do with the psychology of information security. The first is that security experts are [...]