I’ve never been a fan of checklists. Too often, checklists replace thinking and consideration. In the book, Andrew and I wrote: CardSystems had the required security certification, but its security was compromised, so where did things goo wrong? Frameworks such as PCI are built around checklists. Checklists compress complex issues into a list of simple [...]
Filed under: best practice, compliance, data, disclosure by adam on Tuesday, April 10, 2012
3 Comments »
Congratulations to Visa and Mastercard, the latest companies to not notify consumers in a prompt and clear manner, thus inspiring a shrug and a sigh from consumers. No, wait, there isn’t a clear statement, but there is rampant speculation and breathless commentary. It’s always nice to see clear reminders that the way to get people [...]
Filed under: best practice, breaches, disclosure, Doing it Differently by adam on Friday, March 30, 2012
4 Comments »
In the past, we have has some decidedly critical words for the Ponemon Institute reports, such as “A critique of Ponemon Institute methodology for “churn”” or “Another critique of Ponemon’s method for estimating ‘cost of data breach’“. And to be honest, I’d become sufficiently frustrated that I’d focused my time on other things. So I’d [...]
Filed under: best practice, compliance, measurement, Reports and Data by adam on Monday, January 23, 2012
No Comments »
Adam Montville left a comment on my post, “Paper: The Security of Password Expiration“, and I wanted to expand on his question: Passwords suck when they’re not properly cared for. We know this. Any other known form of authentication we have is difficult because of the infrastructure required to pull it off. That sucks too. [...]
Filed under: best practice, Doing it Differently by adam on Tuesday, January 10, 2012
3 Comments »
Norm Marks of the famous Marks On Governance blog has posted his 2012 wishlist. His blog limits the characters you can leave in a reply, so I thought I’d post mine here. 1. Norm Wishes for “A globally-accepted organizational governance code, encompassing both risk management and internal control” Norm, if you mean encompassing both so [...]
Filed under: best practice, Science of Risk Management by alex on Wednesday, December 21, 2011
2 Comments »
Bill Brenner started it with “Stop them before they predict again!:” My inbox has been getting hammered with 2012 vendor security predictions since Halloween. They all pretty much state the obvious: Mobile malware is gonna be a big deal Social networking will continue to be riddled with security holes Technologies A, B and C will [...]
Filed under: best practice, measurement by adam on Wednesday, December 21, 2011
1 Comment »
Over at Risky.biz, Patrick Grey has an entertaining and thought-provoking article, “Why we secretly love LulzSec:” LulzSec is running around pummelling some of the world’s most powerful organisations into the ground… for laughs! For lulz! For shits and giggles! Surely that tells you what you need to know about computer security: there isn’t any. And [...]
Filed under: Amusements, argument, best practice, Doing it Differently by adam on Friday, June 10, 2011
67 Comments »
Hey everybody! I was just reading Gunnar Peterson’s fun little back of the napkin security spending exercise, in which he references his post on a security budget “flat tax” (Three Steps To A Rational Security Budget). This got me to thinking a bit - What if, instead of in the world of compliance where we [...]
Filed under: best practice, compliance, Doing it Differently by alex on Friday, January 14, 2011
5 Comments »
No doubt my “Why I Don’t Like CRISC” blog post has created a ton of traffic and comments. Unfortunately, I’m not a very good writer because the majority of readers miss the point. Let me try again more succinctly: Just because you can codify a standard or practice doesn’t mean that this practice is sane. [...]
Filed under: best practice, best practice, metrics, Science of Risk Management by alex on Sunday, January 2, 2011
4 Comments »
Lately there has been quite a bit of noise about the concept of “trust” in information security. This has always confused me, because I tend towards @bobblakley when he says: “trust is for suckers.” But security is keen on having trendy new memes, things to sell you, and I thought that I might as well [...]
Filed under: best practice, measurement, metrics, Science of Risk Management by alex on Thursday, December 23, 2010
16 Comments »