by adam on February 6, 2012
I’m having trouble responding to Ian, and have come to think that how Ian frames the problem is part of my problem in responding to him. So, as another Adam likes to say, “I reject your reality, and substitute my own.” Here you go:
- “Experiences Threat Modeling at Microsoft” covers the trouble that threat modeling is an aspirational tabula rasa, and people project all sorts of requirements onto processes and methodologies.
- However, I agree with Ian that there’s lots of “Trouble with Threat Modeling.”
- See also my MSDN magazine articles “Uncover Security Design Flaws Using The STRIDE Approach” and “Reinvigorate your Threat Modeling Process” is about how I’m thinking about
threat modeling and some lessons learned. MSDN also published “Getting Started With The SDL Threat Modeling Tool.”
But that’s not my final answer. My final answer is your threat modeling fails because you’re not using Elevation of Privilege.
(Actually, I don’t think that’s why Ian’s threat modeling fails in practice. He’s a smart guy, and I think the issue seems to be one of expectations versus approach, and I think either could be usefully changed, depending on the context.)