<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Data void: False Positives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newschoolsecurity.com/2010/03/data-void-false-positives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newschoolsecurity.com/2010/03/data-void-false-positives/</link>
	<description>The Blog Inspired By The Book</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 16:05:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander</title>
		<link>http://newschoolsecurity.com/2010/03/data-void-false-positives/#comment-3437</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 09:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newschoolsecurity.com/?p=1456#comment-3437</guid>
		<description>Most of false-positives statistics are done over pure-english e-mail gateways. When facing diferent languages, even by Gartner highly rated antispam solution get to 30-35% of false positives. And this is really abusing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of false-positives statistics are done over pure-english e-mail gateways. When facing diferent languages, even by Gartner highly rated antispam solution get to 30-35% of false positives. And this is really abusing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell</title>
		<link>http://newschoolsecurity.com/2010/03/data-void-false-positives/#comment-1230</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newschoolsecurity.com/?p=1456#comment-1230</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s another nice post on the impact of false positives in security, this time regarding automated blocking of &quot;abnormal&quot; bank transfers:

http://securityretentive.blogspot.com/2010/03/bank-fraud-detection-must-balance-false.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s another nice post on the impact of false positives in security, this time regarding automated blocking of &#8220;abnormal&#8221; bank transfers:</p>
<p><a href="http://securityretentive.blogspot.com/2010/03/bank-fraud-detection-must-balance-false.html" rel="nofollow">http://securityretentive.blogspot.com/2010/03/bank-fraud-detection-must-balance-false.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

