<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Dog That Didn&#8217;t Bark at Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newschoolsecurity.com/2010/01/the-dog-that-didnt-bark-at-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newschoolsecurity.com/2010/01/the-dog-that-didnt-bark-at-google/</link>
	<description>The Blog Inspired By The Book</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 16:05:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: shrdlu</title>
		<link>http://newschoolsecurity.com/2010/01/the-dog-that-didnt-bark-at-google/#comment-842</link>
		<dc:creator>shrdlu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newschoolsecurity.com/?p=1253#comment-842</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll bet that the general reaction (not among the infosec community, the rest of the world) was &quot;Wow, sophisticated Chinese hackers, who could blame them for being pwned?&quot;  

Yet another example proving that the non-infosec world&#039;s standards for security are a lot lower than ours.  And I&#039;m not saying that&#039;s necessarily a bad thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll bet that the general reaction (not among the infosec community, the rest of the world) was &#8220;Wow, sophisticated Chinese hackers, who could blame them for being pwned?&#8221;  </p>
<p>Yet another example proving that the non-infosec world&#8217;s standards for security are a lot lower than ours.  And I&#8217;m not saying that&#8217;s necessarily a bad thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doing threat intelligence right &#171; The New School of Information Security</title>
		<link>http://newschoolsecurity.com/2010/01/the-dog-that-didnt-bark-at-google/#comment-838</link>
		<dc:creator>Doing threat intelligence right &#171; The New School of Information Security</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 19:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newschoolsecurity.com/?p=1253#comment-838</guid>
		<description>[...] About the book            &#171; The Dog That Didn&#8217;t Bark at Google [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] About the book            &laquo; The Dog That Didn&#8217;t Bark at Google [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jared pfost</title>
		<link>http://newschoolsecurity.com/2010/01/the-dog-that-didnt-bark-at-google/#comment-837</link>
		<dc:creator>jared pfost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newschoolsecurity.com/?p=1253#comment-837</guid>
		<description>Definitely agree disclosure can be empowering. What&#039;s interesting for me is google&#039;s motivation to disclose and let others fan the flames of IE&#039;s security reality and perception. Beyond the compat lab, who in google uses IE? Looks like there&#039;s lots more to the breaches than IE but the spotlight is on redmond. I&#039;m interested to see what affect this has on IE market %. Google may see customers fleeing to them. Who says security doesn&#039;t enable the business :-)

Now if we can only get some kind of major disruption caused by IE&#039;s lack of open standards support...

ps. to ponder: why wasn&#039;t msft listed as one of the companies targeted by the attackers? Disclosure is not always empowering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely agree disclosure can be empowering. What&#8217;s interesting for me is google&#8217;s motivation to disclose and let others fan the flames of IE&#8217;s security reality and perception. Beyond the compat lab, who in google uses IE? Looks like there&#8217;s lots more to the breaches than IE but the spotlight is on redmond. I&#8217;m interested to see what affect this has on IE market %. Google may see customers fleeing to them. Who says security doesn&#8217;t enable the business <img src='http://newschoolsecurity.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Now if we can only get some kind of major disruption caused by IE&#8217;s lack of open standards support&#8230;</p>
<p>ps. to ponder: why wasn&#8217;t msft listed as one of the companies targeted by the attackers? Disclosure is not always empowering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

