<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Just say &#8216;no&#8217; to FUD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newschoolsecurity.com/2009/10/just-say-no-to-fud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newschoolsecurity.com/2009/10/just-say-no-to-fud/</link>
	<description>The Blog Inspired By The Book</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 06:11:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Network Security Podcast, Episode 172 &#8211; Security Threat Research News</title>
		<link>http://newschoolsecurity.com/2009/10/just-say-no-to-fud/#comment-648</link>
		<dc:creator>The Network Security Podcast, Episode 172 &#8211; Security Threat Research News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 12:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newschoolsecurity.com/?p=836#comment-648</guid>
		<description>[...] Just Say No to FUD. Response to Anton&#8217;s article. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Just Say No to FUD. Response to Anton&#8217;s article. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke O'Connor</title>
		<link>http://newschoolsecurity.com/2009/10/just-say-no-to-fud/#comment-540</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke O'Connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newschoolsecurity.com/?p=836#comment-540</guid>
		<description>Hi, nice article and I have my own take at the link above. My conclusion was 

So ethical considerations aside, I have never considered FUD a long term strategy. Its persistence I imagine can be attributed largely to regular changes in the ranks of security decision makers, and a mind-numbing churn in technology and the IT sector as a whole. The same “new fears” are being presented to new people, as FUD has gone into heavy syndication in the IT Security industry and its always showing in re-runs somewhere. Put your time and energy somewhere else.

In short  fuhgeddaboudit !

rgs Luke</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, nice article and I have my own take at the link above. My conclusion was </p>
<p>So ethical considerations aside, I have never considered FUD a long term strategy. Its persistence I imagine can be attributed largely to regular changes in the ranks of security decision makers, and a mind-numbing churn in technology and the IT sector as a whole. The same “new fears” are being presented to new people, as FUD has gone into heavy syndication in the IT Security industry and its always showing in re-runs somewhere. Put your time and energy somewhere else.</p>
<p>In short  fuhgeddaboudit !</p>
<p>rgs Luke</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell</title>
		<link>http://newschoolsecurity.com/2009/10/just-say-no-to-fud/#comment-476</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newschoolsecurity.com/?p=836#comment-476</guid>
		<description>Yes, I was over-reaching. I have other objections to your recommendations, as I stated, but I was mistaken to label it as all FUD.  See: http://newschoolsecurity.com/2009/11/apologies-to-richard-bejtlich/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I was over-reaching. I have other objections to your recommendations, as I stated, but I was mistaken to label it as all FUD.  See: <a href="http://newschoolsecurity.com/2009/11/apologies-to-richard-bejtlich/" rel="nofollow">http://newschoolsecurity.com/2009/11/apologies-to-richard-bejtlich/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apologies to Richard Bejtlich &#171; The New School of Information Security</title>
		<link>http://newschoolsecurity.com/2009/10/just-say-no-to-fud/#comment-475</link>
		<dc:creator>Apologies to Richard Bejtlich &#171; The New School of Information Security</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newschoolsecurity.com/?p=836#comment-475</guid>
		<description>[...] the second half of my recent post  Just say ‘no’ to FUD, I described Richard Bejtlich&#8217;s post at Tao of Security as &#8220;FUD in other [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the second half of my recent post  Just say ‘no’ to FUD, I described Richard Bejtlich&#8217;s post at Tao of Security as &#8220;FUD in other [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Network Security Blog &#187; The Network Security Podcast, Episode 172</title>
		<link>http://newschoolsecurity.com/2009/10/just-say-no-to-fud/#comment-474</link>
		<dc:creator>Network Security Blog &#187; The Network Security Podcast, Episode 172</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 01:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newschoolsecurity.com/?p=836#comment-474</guid>
		<description>[...] Just Say No to FUD. Response to Anton&#8217;s article. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Just Say No to FUD. Response to Anton&#8217;s article. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Network Security Podcast &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Network Security Podcast, Episode 172</title>
		<link>http://newschoolsecurity.com/2009/10/just-say-no-to-fud/#comment-473</link>
		<dc:creator>Network Security Podcast &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Network Security Podcast, Episode 172</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newschoolsecurity.com/?p=836#comment-473</guid>
		<description>[...] Just Say No to FUD. Response to Anton&#8217;s article. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Just Say No to FUD. Response to Anton&#8217;s article. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wade Baker</title>
		<link>http://newschoolsecurity.com/2009/10/just-say-no-to-fud/#comment-471</link>
		<dc:creator>Wade Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 03:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newschoolsecurity.com/?p=836#comment-471</guid>
		<description>Gotta agree with Richard on this...not sure I see the link between his leadership post and FUD. Overall, I hear what your saying though re FUD. It does drive a lot of wasted investment. Part of the blame is on us though. We&#039;ve got to give decision makers the data they need to make justified decisions. If we do that, I believe the reign of FUD will end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotta agree with Richard on this&#8230;not sure I see the link between his leadership post and FUD. Overall, I hear what your saying though re FUD. It does drive a lot of wasted investment. Part of the blame is on us though. We&#8217;ve got to give decision makers the data they need to make justified decisions. If we do that, I believe the reign of FUD will end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Bejtlich</title>
		<link>http://newschoolsecurity.com/2009/10/just-say-no-to-fud/#comment-469</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Bejtlich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newschoolsecurity.com/?p=836#comment-469</guid>
		<description>This sounds like a pretty desperate attempt to link my post about leadership to a post on FUD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds like a pretty desperate attempt to link my post about leadership to a post on FUD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anton Chuvakin</title>
		<link>http://newschoolsecurity.com/2009/10/just-say-no-to-fud/#comment-465</link>
		<dc:creator>Anton Chuvakin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 00:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newschoolsecurity.com/?p=836#comment-465</guid>
		<description>This is really COOL; I so am happy that it sparked this!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really COOL; I so am happy that it sparked this!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
